File #: ORD-3490    Version: 1
Type: Ordinance Status: Consent Agenda
File created: 2/22/2018 In control: City Council
On agenda: 3/6/2018 Final action:
Title: Consider adopting Ordinance No. 3490 approving a tariff authorizing an annual rate review mechanism ("RRM") as negotiated between Atmos Energy Corp., Mid-Tex Division and the Steering Committee of Cities Served by Atmos; and take appropriate action.
Indexes: Atmos
Attachments: 1. Ordinance No. 3490 with Exhibit "A", 2. Frequently Asked Questions
Related files: ORD 3229, ORD-3445, ORD-3325, ORD-3371, R2018-86, ORD-3596
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsPacketVideo
No records to display.
Title
Consider adopting Ordinance No. 3490 approving a tariff authorizing an annual rate review mechanism ("RRM") as negotiated between Atmos Energy Corp., Mid-Tex Division and the Steering Committee of Cities Served by Atmos; and take appropriate action.

Body
BACKGROUND:
The City, along with 171 other Mid-Texas Cities Served by Atmos Energy Corporation, Mid-Tex Division ("Atmos Mid-Tex" or "Company"), is a member of the Steering Committee of Cities Served by Atmos ("Cities"). In 2007, the Cities and Atmos Mid-Tex settled a rate application filed by the Company pursuant to Section 104.301 of the Texas Utilities Code for an interim rate adjustment commonly referred to as a GRIP filing (arising out of the Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program legislation). That settlement created a substitute rate review process, referred to as Rate Review Mechanism ("RRM"), as a substitute for future filings under the GRIP statute.
Since 2007, there have been several modifications to the original RRM Tariff. The Ordinance that resolved the Company's application under the RRM Tariff in 2017 also terminated the existing RRM Tariff and required a renegotiation of the terms of that tariff. Negotiations have taken place over the past several months, and have resulted in a revised RRM Tariff that has been agreed to by the Company. The Cities' Executive Committee has recommended acceptance of the revised RRM Tariff, which is attached to the Ordinance.
DISCUSSION:
Cities strongly opposed the GRIP process because it constitutes piecemeal ratemaking by ignoring declining expenses and increasing revenues and rewarding the Company for increasing capital investment. The GRIP process does not allow any review of the reasonableness of capital investment and does not allow cities to participate in the Railroad Commission's review of annual GRIP filings or recover their rate case expenses. The Railroad Commission undertakes a mere administrative review of GRIP filings (instead of a full h...

Click here for full text