File #: R2018-93    Version: 1
Type: Resolution Status: Consent Agenda
File created: 9/17/2018 In control: City Council
On agenda: 10/1/2018 Final action:
Title: Consider approving Resolution No. 2018-093 awarding the bid for painting the elevated water storage tank located at 13333 Davis Lane north of Valley View Lane to J.R. Stelzer Company and take appropriate action.
Attachments: 1. Location Map, 2. Birkhoff, Hendricks & Carter Recommendation Letter, 3. Resolution No 2018-093, 4. Bid Tab
Related files: R2018-093
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsPacketVideo
No records to display.
Title
Consider approving Resolution No. 2018-093 awarding the bid for painting the elevated water storage tank located at 13333 Davis Lane north of Valley View Lane to J.R. Stelzer Company and take appropriate action.

Body
BACKGROUND:
The City's West Side 2 Million gallon elevated water storage tank located at 13333 Davis Lane was built in 2006. Storage tanks generally need painting every fifteen years, however the exposure to the Texas sun has deteriorated the paint to the extent that it needs to be repainted. The City executed a professional service agreement with Birkhoff, Hendricks and Carter, LLP to provide engineering services associated with testing of existing paint, evaluating structural repairs if needed, and prepare the plans and specifications for repainting the exterior tank.

DISCUSSION:
The 2018-2019 Capital Improvement Program Non-bond Utility Fund has available funds for painting the 2 Million gallon elevated water storage tank at 13333 Davis Lane.
On August 21, 2018, seven competitive bids for the tank painting were opened. On September 13, 2018, City staff and Engineering Consultant assembled as a committee to evaluate the bidders on the following basis in order to reach the most qualified contractor for the project. The evaluation of the bidders was based on a point system with 60 points maximum for bid price and 40 points maximum for the following: completeness of package (5 pnts), years of experience (10 pnts), similar projects (5 pnts), executing the work write-up (10 pnts), superintend experience (5 pnts) and subcontractors used (5 pnts). The committee eliminated five of the seven proposals due to bid amounts that were greater than the budget. The third lowest bid was eliminated due to lengthy litigation they reported on projects. The evaluation score was added to the bid price score to determine the best qualified contractor for this project. Through this process based on the scoring and the contract amount of $276,584.00, the co...

Click here for full text